The build outruns the specification
Pages look finished before redirects, CMS behavior, analytics and acceptance criteria are agreed.
AI website builds & migration
Launch a site buyers trust—without gambling your search equity.
Codex- and Claude Code-assisted workflows accelerate architecture, implementation and repeated QA. A senior operator controls the specification, reviews changes and owns migration risk from baseline through monitoring.
You own the repository, CMS and hosting relationship. Search-engine behavior is never guaranteed; controllable migration risk is documented in the scope.
The expensive failure mode
A redesign changes more than the screen.
URLs, templates, internal links, metadata, schema, analytics and conversion paths can all change at once. AI makes production faster; it does not make those dependencies disappear.
Search signals disappear at cutover
URLs, canonicals, metadata, schema and internal links are changed or lost without parity checks.
Nobody owns launch risk
The agency, developer and SEO partner each assume someone else is watching the baseline and rollback conditions.
Concrete scope
What you receive—not just what we do.
Every build includes ownership, maintainability and measurement. Migration scopes add URL-level decisions, parity QA, cutover controls and monitoring.
Information architecture, page roles, buyer paths and acceptance criteria before implementation.
Server-rendered implementation in a repository you control, with a maintainable stack.
Publishing workflow, forms, analytics and agreed business integrations.
Metadata, canonicals, schema, sitemaps, robots rules, performance and internal-link controls.
URL inventory, 1:1 redirect decisions, content parity, staging checks and rollback conditions.
Responsive, accessibility and browser QA plus monitoring, documentation and client ownership.
Delivery process
From uncertainty to a documented decision.
Agent speed is used in the build phase. Redirect decisions, parity review and cutover gates remain deliberate and human-owned.
Audit and specify
Map pages, demand, integrations, analytics, risks and the definition of done.
Build in parallel
Implement reusable components, pages, CMS and integrations on staging.
Verify and cut over
Run parity, redirect, analytics, accessibility, performance and rollback checks.
Monitor and hand off
Watch agreed indicators, resolve anomalies and deliver code, documentation and ownership.
Build and migration model
The commitment is in the scope
Risk control should be written down before launch—not implied by a portfolio image.
The pre-cutover baseline, URL ownership, parity gates, rollback conditions, monitoring window and remediation responsibilities are documented for the project.
Illustration shown. No honest provider can guarantee rankings, traffic retention or a fixed recovery date because external systems remain outside its control. We commit to the controllable process and evidence.
Inspect the Work page
Ways to engage
Start at the level your evidence supports.
Published entry pricing makes the first decision easier. Final build and migration quotes are fixed after scope and dependencies are known.
Audit & Blueprint
You want the architecture, risk map and fixed quote before committing to implementation.
$1,500 one-timeCredited toward an approved build or migration.
- Crawl and analytics baseline
- URL and integration inventory
- Architecture and risk map
- Written fixed-price proposal
AI-Assisted Website Build
Launch on an owned, maintainable technical and conversion foundation.
From $6,500 fixedTimeline confirmed after specification.
- Server-rendered production site
- CMS and agreed integrations
- Technical SEO and schema
- QA, launch and handoff
Search-Safe Migration
Move a ranked site with URL-level controls and a documented monitoring plan.
From $9,500 fixedFinal quote follows the audit.
- Everything in the blueprint
- 1:1 redirect decisions
- Parity and cutover QA
- 90-day monitoring scope
Pricing last reviewed July 2026. Scope changes, third-party licenses and integrations are itemized before approval rather than hidden in an hourly overage.
Why this model
The difference is operational, not cosmetic.
The operating advantage is fewer handoffs and parallel implementation—not skipping the engineering and migration controls that protect the business.
Builder or agency relay
- You speak mainly to a project manager
- SEO and analytics appear late in the build
- Ownership depends on a hosted platform
- Migration responsibilities remain ambiguous
FunnelLeaders build model
- Direct access to the senior operator
- Search, measurement and conversion in the specification
- Client-owned code and documented handoff
- Named parity, cutover and monitoring controls
Fit before pitch
A strong fit—and the cases where it is not.
Clear qualification protects your budget and our ability to be accountable. We would rather disqualify the engagement than sell the wrong scope.
Strong fit
- You need a new site with a defined offer and decision owner
- You are migrating a site with traffic, rankings or critical conversion paths
- You value code ownership, documentation and measurable acceptance criteria
Probably not yet
- You want a one-day template with no discovery or QA
- Stakeholders cannot approve architecture, copy or integrations
- You require guaranteed rankings or a universal recovery timeline
Straight answers
Questions buyers ask before they commit.
Will a migration reduce our rankings?
No provider controls search-engine behavior. We reduce avoidable risk through baseline data, URL-level redirect decisions, parity QA, analytics continuity, staged cutover and monitoring against agreed thresholds.
Is this an AI website builder?
No. Coding agents accelerate implementation, but the output is a real, maintainable codebase with a CMS and documented ownership. Architecture, claims, risk and release decisions remain human-owned.
How long will the build take?
The timeline depends on page count, migration type, integrations, content readiness and stakeholder approvals. It is confirmed after the blueprint rather than promised before dependencies are known.
Can our team edit the website?
Yes. The CMS and publishing workflow are part of the specification so agreed content can be maintained without editing source code.
What happens after launch?
We verify analytics, redirects, crawl state and agreed conversion paths, monitor the indicators defined in scope and hand off the repository, CMS, documentation and unresolved decision log.
Build the new website without turning launch day into a blind bet.
Start with the architecture, URL inventory and risk map. You will know the scope, controls and fixed quote before implementation begins.
Plan my build or migrationClient-owned code. Human-approved release. No search-engine guarantees.